Talk:Object - Revision history

Kosik at 09:25, 19 June 2009

Kosik — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:25:57 GMT

New page

I have redirected a link of the term '''object''' (as it is used by us---people concerned with security) back to the article located at this wiki.

I think it is OK to refer to those Wikipedia articles that contain text with which we aggree but I think, and particularly if it is related to security, we can boldly use our definitions that depart from the majority's viewpoint.

For example, even if majority uses the term [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege POLP], we know why we reject it and use the term [[POLA]]. We are different, we speak differently, our words may have different meanings. This wiki can capture this. When it is important, we should retain our viewpoint regardless of the viewpoint of majority.

Wikipedia articles can be updated when ours and majority's viewpoint will become consistent.

[[User:Kosik|Kosik]] 04:19, 19 June 2009 (CDT)

Kosik at 09:24, 19 June 2009

Kosik — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:24:46 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 19 June 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	For example, even if majority uses the term [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege POLP], we know why we reject it and use the term [[POLA]]. We are different, we speak differently, our words may have different meanings. This wiki can capture this. When it is important, we should retain our viewpoint regardless of the viewpoint of majority.		For example, even if majority uses the term [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege POLP], we know why we reject it and use the term [[POLA]]. We are different, we speak differently, our words may have different meanings. This wiki can capture this. When it is important, we should retain our viewpoint regardless of the viewpoint of majority.

-	Wikipedia articles can be updated when ~~majority adopts~~ our viewpoint.	+	Wikipedia articles can be updated when our and majority's viewpoint will become consistent.

	[[User:Kosik\|Kosik]] 04:19, 19 June 2009 (CDT)		[[User:Kosik\|Kosik]] 04:19, 19 June 2009 (CDT)

Kosik at 09:19, 19 June 2009

Kosik — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:19:02 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 19 June 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	For example, even if majority uses the term [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege POLP], we know why we reject it and use the term [[POLA]]. We are different, we speak differently, our words may have different meanings. This wiki can capture this. When it is important, we should retain our viewpoint regardless of the viewpoint of majority.		For example, even if majority uses the term [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege POLP], we know why we reject it and use the term [[POLA]]. We are different, we speak differently, our words may have different meanings. This wiki can capture this. When it is important, we should retain our viewpoint regardless of the viewpoint of majority.

-	Wikipedia articles can be updated when ~~ours and~~ majority's viewpoint ~~will become consistent~~.	+	Wikipedia articles can be updated when majority adopts our viewpoint.

	[[User:Kosik\|Kosik]] 04:19, 19 June 2009 (CDT)		[[User:Kosik\|Kosik]] 04:19, 19 June 2009 (CDT)