User:ThomasLeonard
From Erights
(Difference between revisions)
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* At [http://www.it-innovation.soton.ac.uk/ IT Innovation], for some of our experimental work on service oriented architectures. | * At [http://www.it-innovation.soton.ac.uk/ IT Innovation], for some of our experimental work on service oriented architectures. | ||
- | * At [http://0install.net/ebox.html 0install.net], as a demonstrator showing how to use 0install to run sandboxed applications with distributed | + | * At [http://0install.net/ebox.html 0install.net], as a demonstrator showing how to use 0install to run sandboxed applications with distributed dependencies. |
== Branches == | == Branches == |
Revision as of 12:07, 9 November 2010
I'm using E for two separate projects:
- At IT Innovation, for some of our experimental work on service oriented architectures.
- At 0install.net, as a demonstrator showing how to use 0install to run sandboxed applications with distributed dependencies.
Branches
I publish my patches to my E Git repository. The next branch generally contains things I consider ready for merging into the E svn repository.
Other patches/branches:
- Make CapTP shutdown when its vat is shutdown (on next).
- Split Scope into Scope (internal data structure for the E interpreter, including local variables, etc) and EEnv (simpler structure exposed to E code, replacing safeScope, etc). This avoids the need to tame access to these objects and hopefully makes the code easier to read.
- Various possible optimisations are on the compiler branch (these mostly have only a small benefit or don't work fully; otherwise I push them to next). These optimisations work for both the current E interpreter and for a possible future E compiler. There is also a very old wip-compiler branch that actually does compile E to JVM bytecode. However, it turned out that the major performance problems were elsewhere.