From Erights
(Difference between revisions)
m |
m |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | The concept is introduced in [http://web.archive.org/web/20071118205050/www.agorics.com/Library/agoricpapers/aos/aos.6.html#section6.1.2 Agoric Open Systems: Agoric Systems in the Large - Section 6.1.2 Hardware Encapsulation]
| + | Intro to concept goes here. |
| | | | |
| - | It is criticised in [http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]
| + | ---- |
| | | | |
| - | Reasoning of that post was rebutted on #erights on irc.freenode.org .
| + | [http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes] |
| - | | + | |
| - | The rebuttal was somewhat like this:
| + | |
| - | The boxes need not to trust each other. Only the developers need to trust an brand of an opaque box.
| + | |
| - | Therefore what trust between two brands of opaque boxes is inhertenly based on the trust of the developer
| + | |
| - | that programmed an system that could span them in these brands.
| + | |
Revision as of 00:39, 15 March 2009
Intro to concept goes here.
Against opaque boxes
